Smooth copper isn't always what it is purported to be.
I always trusted datasheets. Why shouldn't I? Every time I picked one up, I understood they were harbingers of truth about what something did and how to interact with it. From chips to components to widgets, manufacturers have a vested interest in ensuring users know what and how to use their products.
My trust in datasheets was eviscerated the very week I entered the printed circuit board industry. I was attending a weeklong training session on signal integrity taught by Eric Bogatin when he surveyed the attendees about datasheets and their accuracy. While my memory of the day and exact content isn't perfect, I do recall that as the very moment I learned the harsh reality: Datasheets are sometimes not as accurate as one would hope! (As an aside, Eric Bogatin's books on signal integrity are excellent resources because he has that special gift of teaching and explaining complex topics in approachable and understandable ways. The concept of "being the signal" and walking down a transmission line is just fantastic.)
Don't mix your units.
When I first started in the PCB fabrication industry, I was fresh from college and ready to jump in and make an impact. The first hurdle I hit was likely the same as many first-time designers: units of measure for PCB design. Remember back in school, your physics professors or science teachers likely pointed out missing units in tables, graphs or homework assignments? That problem.
Figure 1. The three units of measure commonly used to describe the relative thickness of a PCB layer.
Not every design is practical for every volume.
Not long ago, a customer sent us an 8-layer rigid PCB design for quotation. On the surface, nothing unusual – until we noticed the minimum finished hole size (FHS) was 4 mils. That number might not sound alarming, but in PCB manufacturing, 4 mils is a red flag. Here’s why.
The issue arises when fabricators drill a plated through-hole (PTH) and deposit copper during plating. The remaining diameter after this process becomes the finished hole size. A 4-mil FHS with a tolerance of ±4 mils technically ranges from 0 to 8 mils. That kind of spread becomes nearly impossible to maintain in volume production.
The question not asked may be cause for concern.
It is essential for PCB fabricators to ask their customers engineering questions before production. Clarifying design requirements and expectations ensures they are fully understood, preventing costly errors, avoiding liberties being taken in the fabrication process, resulting in a product that meets both performance and reliability standards.
I write this not only to set clear expectations for customers but to strongly caution that when questions are not asked, there may be cause for concern. Questions must be asked so we can align objectives. The PCB is custom manufactured, and in many cases, the fabricator is either replicating something another manufacturer has built or creating something entirely new. In both scenarios, setting clear expectations is critical. If someone else has built it, we must know what we’re matching. Conversely, if the part number is a first-time build, the customers must understand that we’re doing something that has not been achieved.