The basics of line impedance influences.
The basics of line impedance influences.
Five rules of thumb for getting it right.
As we welcome increasing numbers of IoT devices into our industries, offices and homes, we shouldn’t be surprised to see increasing electromagnetic (EM) congestion. Or, as it’s now dubbed, the “Interference of Things.”
This is because the majority of IoT devices are wireless, and many use multiple communications protocols – WiFi, Bluetooth and Zigbee – to interface with other devices, routers and the cloud. Creating an IoT device requires a rich mix of design elements and disciplines, including digital and analog, electromechanical (e.g., actuation), mixed-signal transducers (sensors) and RF.
Consider the whole device. From an EMC perspective, the entire IoT device needs to be considered, rather than a single PCB in isolation. Indeed, a typical IoT device is a 3-D multi-board design challenge, where some of the boards might be flexible. The flexible materials and the shapes they form when flexed all contribute to the device’s EM profile in terms of radiation and susceptibility.
As chips get smaller, the package designers are getting creative in their effort to make room for component leads. Texas Instruments’ new X2SON package sports triangular footpads in a pattern that I’m not sure I’ve seen before. X2SON stands for extra small outline no-lead. In my experience, TI is one of the better companies insofar as testing and documenting manufacturability is concerned. The datasheet for this device (ti.com/lit/an/scea055/scea055.pdf) is no exception.