NEW YORK – Carl Icahn, Mentor Graphics' largest shareholder, today sharply criticized the EDA company's board for refusing to retain his handpicked choices.

In a statement regarding the upcoming annual shareholders meeting, scheduled for May 30, Icahn said: “As the company's largest shareholder, we were disappointed by the board's decision not to re-nominate Gary Meyers and Jose Maria Alapont, two of the three directors elected by shareholders as a result of our proxy contest last year. We view this action as an affront to shareholders and shareholder democracy – especially given that ISS, the leading independent proxy advisory firm, recommended last year that shareholders vote for both Messrs. Alapont and Meyers.

"This action, in combination with the board's recent decision to extend the company's odious poison pill without shareholder approval, clearly indicates that the company's long track record of poor corporate governance has still not changed. Indeed, on May 15th, ISS issued a report recommending that shareholders withhold votes for all of the incumbent director nominees because of the board's unilateral extension of the pill.

"Today we were provided with a copy of [a] letter from Mentor Graphics to ISS, which indicates that David Schechter, our nominee and the last remaining shareholder representative on the board, voted against extending the poison pill.

"We agree with ISS' view that withhold votes are warranted for incumbent director nominees Walden Rhines, Gregory Hinckley, Peter Bonfield, Kevin McDonough and Patrick McManus. However, we believe that shareholders would benefit greatly by having Mr. Schechter remain as a director to serve as a last line of defense against the despotic impulses of the still-entrenched majority. We hope that ISS will consider changing its voting recommendation as to Mr. Schechter due to his demonstrated unwillingness to ‘remain silent in the face of tyranny.’ Hopefully, his presence in the boardroom will be a constant reminder to the other directors that contemptuous behavior aimed at disenfranchising the owners of the company will not go unnoticed by the shareholders.”

• Prev
• Next