The survey suggests the U.S. designer resource is aging at an excellerated rate, so we need to ask, “Where is the next generation of PCB designers?”

We have just completed our annual salary survey. The results from a number of perspectives were very predictable. Our audience and, therefore the people who responded, are on average two years older than they were last year indicating that there has been no significant young engineers joining the ranks.

In 2007, the designers who participated made on average over $10,000 more than their 2006 counterparts. This jump can be attributed to a slightly different mix in the respondents versus 2006. There were a higher number of more experienced and older designers responding this year versus last year as our average age increased by two versus the anticipated one year.

We weren’t quite sure how the numbers would track compared to previous surveys as we did a few things a bit differently than we have in the past. First, we limited the audience to only a few thousand designers who were picked at random. In the past, we have sent the survey to a much larger portion of our design readership, so it was our first design survey using a smaller, random sample audience. Also, we left the survey open for only two weeks. In the past, we have left it open for responses from four to six weeks with multiple reminders to participate. This year after the initial e-mail blast notifying the selected designers about the survey, it remained available for two weeks with a follow-up reminder a few days before the survey closed.

The questions were similar to those from previous years. We removed a few questions and reduced the mandatory response so that there were 48 mandatory questions in total. Those designers who responded where offered an incentive in the form of a chance to receive a three-day technical conference pass to either PCB East or PCB West in 2008.

Over 500 designers responded to some parts of the survey, and 230 completed the entire mandatory portion of the survey and were tallied in the results presented below. The percentage of responses was 4.6% – actually up from 2.7% in 2006. About 10% of the readers surveyed answered some of the questions, but a large percentage did not answer all of the 48 mandatory questions, so their answers could not be included in the results.

Image

Education versus Experience

One question often asked by designers is what type of education is needed to help you be more successful and achieve higher rewards as a designer. It was interesting to look at the 2007 respondents based on their educational background, the types of educational programs they continued to be involved in and their actual salaries to get an idea of what is really important.

Like nature and nurture, experience and education are the critical foils of successful development in any profession. It was interesting to see how these two factors affected the salary achievements in our respondents.

According to the survey, designers with five or less years experience in North America earned the lowest average salary, coming in at just under $40,000. It was interesting to note that with six to 10 years experience, the average salaries jumped to $68,000 equivalent to a 72% increase. This seems to indicate that there is a minimum time-on-the-job milestone on the road to success.

As reflected in Figure 1, years of experience do influence a designer’s salary, but over time, the rate of increase drops dramatically, so that the difference in the average salary of a designer with over 30 years of experience and that of a designer with 25 to 30 years of experience is minimal.

Image

What about education? The results of the survey were actually very interesting in this regard. Only 23.4% of the respondents indicated that they had a bachelor’s, master’s or Ph.D. degree. The majority of designers had either a high school education or had some college without completing a degree; or they had earned a one-or two-year associate’s degree. As reflected in Figure 2, the difference between getting a bachelor’s degree in anything other than a BSEE and a high school only education was not a significant factor in the resulting salary.

Image

The average salary for a designer who learned on the job with only a high school background was about $70,000 per year. With an associate’s degree, the salary was still at $70,000. A designer with some college working toward a BA/BS degree earned slightly more at $76,000 average. The BSEE-degreed designer, however, sees a significant increase in earnings with an average salary of over $125,000, and a Ph.D. holder can also anticipate earning a six-figure salary.

Higher Salaries for Higher-Tech Designs

It was interesting to note that there didn’t appear to be a significant difference between the types of designs being worked on or the number of projects per year as far as salary goes. Designers working on one to 30 design projects per year earned on average $70,000 to $80,000 per year. Those working on 31 to 50 projects per year had a jump to over $100,000 per year on average, but working more than 50 projects per year resulted in a decrease in average salary back to the $70,000 range (Figure 3).

Image

Likewise, it seemed that it didn’t mater if you were designing single and double-sided boards, or multilayers. The difference in salary was not significant. The average salaries were on track with the overall average of $78,678. A difference was noted for those designers who indicated that they only worked exclusively on boards that were over seven layers or some specialty products such as BGAs, MCMs and packaging designs. Their average salaries were closer to the $100,000 mark. (Figure 4).

Image

Strong OEM and Military Involvement

The designers who responded were from a wide variety of companies. Tracking with our readership demographics, 64.3% (Figure 5) work for OEM companies. The next largest group works for design service bureaus at 12.2%. The markets served by the designers represent a product mix with a higher than expected level of military/government/avionics companies at 20%, as seen in Figure 6, compared to a typical market mix that would have the segment at 5% to 6%.

Image

Image

Forty percent of the designers who responded worked for either very large companies with over 3,001 employees (20.4%) or very small companies with 1 to 50 employees (19.6%) as shown in Figure 7.

Image

Job Satisfaction Factor

One of the key measurements for job satisfaction is overall satisfaction with the career decision and one’s current position. In the case of this year’s respondents, they were generally very satisfied with their jobs. In fact, a whopping 89.1% of the respondents where either very satisfied or satisfied with their career choice as reflected in Figure 8. That is a significant approval rating. And 72.1% (Figure 9) were satisfied or very satisfied with the current position. The stability in the profession is further reflected in Table 1 where 92.2% of the respondents had the same position as they held last year.

Image

Image

It is somewhat of a concern that we are facing what appears to be an aging designer population with apparently little influx in young design talent. This is, in fact, quite disconcerting to many industry professionals. In light of the fact that the profession pays well and offers excellent opportunities for advancement for designers and engineers regardless of their educational background, it would seem that there would be a steady stream of young, hopeful design apprentices moving into the ranks and up the salary ladder.

The only reason I can think of that this is not occurring is that electrical engineering and the electronic design process are two of the best-kept secrets with regards to actual job function and potential benefit. In a recent job satisfaction survey conducted by EE Times, it was reported that over 70% of engineers still recommend engineering to children as a career. It’s time that message reached a larger audience.
In addition to salary, standard holiday and vacation time, the survey asked designers about additional perks and incentives offered by their companies. The benefits included, as anticipated, health and dental insurance, both available to over 75% of the respondents (Figure 10), as well as profit sharing and a gym/exercise room with both available to about 30% of the designers and child care available to about 3% of respondents.

Image

Education, as mentioned before in terms of specific college degrees may not be the leading indicator of how well a designer is compensated, but experience and on-the-job training seem to be key factors. The good news is that companies recognize the requirement for experiential learning for their designers. As reflected in Figure 11, over 60% of designers indicated that their companies supported their attendance at technical conferences to attend classes that offer design-specific training. This is an essential component in the development of a designer regardless of his or her academic background.

 

Conclusions

The 2007 design salary survey reflects a stable but aging population. With an average age of 46 globally and 48 in North America, designers aren’t ready quite yet for retirement, but without a steady influx of new blood, it won’t be too many years before the numbers begin to dwindle as older members begin to retire at a steady pace.

Recently, AOL ran an article on the top jobs in the U.S. based on a salary and education matrix. The types of jobs listed ranged from non-degreed jobs that paid $10 per hour to six-year degree jobs that paid $30 per hour. In reviewing the over 30 positions represented, I did not find a mention of electrical engineer, PCB designer or PCB layout engineer.

For the 56.5% of you who responded that your company offers a tuition reimbursement program, you might want to consider going after that BSEE. It appears to be a short cut to a significant salary jump. If more schooling is not for you, that’s okay, too. Just keep enriching your experiences with company-sponsored classes, technical conference attendance and on-the-job training because it looks like education is a key factor in recognition, salary and overall achievement in PCB design.  PCD&F

Kathy Nargi-Toth is editor of Printed Circuit Design & Fab; knargitoth [at] upmediagroup.com.
Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedInPrint Article