Thermal prototyping is a challenge for many design engineers. Many do not understand that a heater must be properly configured to the thermal demands of the intended application for it to perform most effectively. The complex physics of heat transfer makes it difficult to predict all aspects of system performance in the early design stages. Therefore, applications requiring tightly regulated temperature may require extensive prototype work. A lot of time, effort and money can be saved if thermal integration is properly addressed and configured in the prototyping stage.
Numerical analysis can eliminate part of the cost and lead time of repeated bench trials with actual equipment. Two analytical methods are detailed here.
Thermal transfer estimation. Thermal estimation programs use simplified heat transfer equations to provide initial estimates of total wattage requirements. They consider warm-up and process heat requirements, plus losses due to convection and radiation. Thermal estimation programs can yield a good starting value for heater wattage but usually fall short of an exhaustive analysis. They necessarily oversimplify both the description of the heater/heatsink and the heat loss formulas. However, wattage estimation programs should often be the first design step toward a prototyping benchmark, as they are not time-consuming and are relatively inexpensive.
Finite elements analysis. Computerized FEA more accurately simulates thermal systems. It subdivides the heater and hardware into discrete elements and calculates the thermal profile of each element. FEA can model both steady state and transient conditions, in two or three dimensions. Advantages of this method include:
|
FEA does have limitations, though. Even the best model cannot account for all factors operating on and in the system. Plus, depending on design complexity, FEA can be more expensive and time-consuming than experimentation. Also, FEA never fully replaces bench testing of heaters. You may still need to make more than one hardware iteration for ideal profiled patterns.
The most accurate approach to heater design is the most direct: Mount heaters to the heatsink, power them and test operating parameters until the system behaves as desired. A typical test setup will include the heated device, heaters, temperature measurement instruments, power supply (AC or DC) and a controller.
Experiments must produce data, and you will need some means to observe and/or record temperatures in your system. Thin, flexible resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), thermocouples or thermistors are often cost-effective sensors for detecting temperatures.
In many instances you must measure temperature gradients across whole surfaces, not just single points. Infrared imaging answers this need. A thermal video system can vividly reveal temperature gradients in both static and dynamic situations. It can resolve temperature differentials within a fraction of a degree and provides video output for taping of test results in addition to live display. Furthermore, the imager's isothermal maps can furnish solid empirical data to verify or improve FEA models.
Thermal imaging requires line-of-sight access to the heated area. Because heater mounting hardware and housings will affect heat loss, heaters must operate in the actual equipment for reliable observations. Where thermal imaging cannot "see" the heater, you may want to monitor temperature with an array of sensors connected to a multichannel recorder or data acquisition system.
Many companies offer off-the-shelf stock heaters in a variety of sizes and insulation packages, including polyimide, silicone rubber, mica, optically clear polyester or PTFE. If the size or shape of your heatsink precludes using a single standard heater, you can often construct a mosaic to cover the surface.
Grouped etched-foil heaters can also mimic profiled designs. Increase power to certain heaters until temperature stabilizes in the desired pattern; the resulting power settings tell you how to profile the watt density zones in a custom design.
|
In the setup shown in Figure 2, the first variable AC power supply (e.g., "Variac") drives the inner elements, while the second separately powers the outer elements. Adjusting the power to give uniform watt density produces the thermal profile shown in Figure 3.
|
Operating the outer heaters at a higher watt density (higher watts per unit area, not necessarily higher total wattage) cancels the edge losses for more uniform temperature (Figure 4).
|
Once the thermal system behaves as desired, record the power settings for each element. Etched element heater manufacturers can then reproduce the watt pattern in a custom single-element heater (narrower strands produce higher watt density). See Figure 5.
|
Note that you can change the wiring to place Variacs between controllers and heaters for simultaneous testing of wattage and control methods provided that the controller furnishes AC power, not DC, to the heater. Power resistors or rheostats in series with the heater can be used to scale DC or AC voltage.
Odd-shaped heat sinks may require custom heaters for profile testing. Although this approach incurs the setup cost of a custom heater, the overall price tag may be less than consulting fees for FEA.
The custom heater in Figure 6 has a guard element running along both the inner and outer edges in addition to the central heating element. Each element operates from its own power supply. As with the simple rectangular heater, the finished design will have a single profiled element (Figure 7).
|
|
A comparison of control methods, both mechanical and electronic, is too broad a topic for this article. There are many different controller options available on the market, each with unique options for different applications. The best way pick one is to assess your control needs for your specific application, and contact a control manufacturer and inquire about available products.
Some companies offer thermal imaging as a paid consulting service to help you optimize heater designs. You can send your heatsink and associated hardware for testing, or the consulting service can bring the imager to your plant if necessary. Results can be output on videotape or as color printouts (Figure 8).
|
Thermal imagers operate by detecting infrared radiation at wavelengths from 2 to 5.6 µm. They convert the radiation to patterns of color corresponding to temperature.
Understanding the concept of "emissivity" is essential for accurate thermal imaging. Maximum infrared radiation is emitted from an ideal material called a blackbody. All other materials emit less radiation at the same temperature. A material's emissivity is the ratio of its thermal radiation to that of a blackbody. As a rule of thumb, electrical insulators (like plastics and paint) have high emissivity values, around 0.9. Metals range from 0.05 to 0.4 for shiny surfaces, and 0.3 to 0.9 for anodized or oxidized surfaces.
Practical implications of emissivity are:
The broad range of uses for etched-foil heaters makes prototyping a unique experience for almost every application. Tools exist to make the prototyping process accurate, reliable and, in many cases, cost-efficient. Thermal estimation programs and FEA are practicable prototyping methods. However, experimentation with heaters, sensors and controllers is the most accurate way to determine the nominal watt density and profile for your application. Thermagrophy is also a useful tool when a custom profiled etched-foil heater is needed. PCD&M
Brian Williams is global marketing manager for the Heaters Division of Minco (www.minco.com). He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..