Via stubs can be tamed by keeping the length short, restricting signal layer transitions, and utilizing back drilling in multigigabit applications.

You need to read this article because you’ve built your backplane with the lowest dielectric loss laminate you could afford. The connectors are rated at 20 GHz bandwidth, and your trace impedances are within 5% of 100 Ohms. Your SERDES I/O drivers have multi-tap de-emphasis and equalization built in. All 50 inches of path length is perfectly matched and tuned. You’ve simulated the system with a pretty good link analyzer and have confidence you will see a 10 Gbps eye that is open with plenty of margin over the eye mask.

But, when you power on and look at the eye for the first time, it’s nearly closed. The bit error rate (BER) is 0.1%, more than nine orders of magnitude higher than you expected! So, what went wrong? What’s killing the signal?

Like a tiny clot in an artery that can take a person down, one of the killers of high speed serial links is the via stub, a tiny piece of interconnect, that can take down a backplane many times its size. It is an artifact of the process of manufacturing through hole vias, and can be the death of a high speed interconnect.

Through Hole Vias

Vias are essential structures in all multilayer circuit boards that enable a signal to switch from one layer to another. The through hole via – often referred to as a plated through hole (PTH) via – is by far the most common and the lowest cost via in multi layer boards. After the entire board is laminated in a press, vias are mechanically drilled through the entire stack, and the inside of the hole (called the barrel) is metallized to make it conductive using an electrochemical plating process. Surface traces and pads are plated at the same time.

Every through hole is capable of connecting any layer to any other layer. Each through hole is programmed by the pads, signal lines or planes that intersect the drilled hole. When a drill passes through copper on any layer, the edge of the copper inside the hole is exposed, and when the entire barrel is metallized, any exposed metal is electrically connected.

In a multilayer board, a via may connect a signal from any layer to any other layer. In the case of the 12-layer board shown in Figure 1, the via connects signal layers 1 to 4.

Fig. 1

As part of the manufacturing process, the via is plated all the way through the board, even though the signal itself may only travel through part of the barrel. The rest of the barrel (in this case, below layer 4) is called the stub. The residual stub acts as a short transmission line to the signal. At low frequency, the impact is a capacitive load, but at high frequency, it is a resonant structure that can have a dramatic impact on signal integrity.

Electrical Performance of Vias

The only way to know the precise electrical performance of the stub is by either simulating the via performance using a full wave electromagnetic simulation tool, or building a test structure and measuring it.

Figure 2 shows the measured insertion loss of a long backplane trace with a signal layer transitioning from the top layer to layer second from the top, with a resulting residual stub of about 200 mils long.

Fig. 2

Of course, changing any of the geometry features, such as clearance holes, location of return vias, plane-to-plane spacing and even barrel diameter, will change the performance.

In the absence of a measurement or a full wave 3D simulation for every via, we can get a very good estimate of the electrical impact of a via, and identify the main features that affect its performance, by modeling it. The modeling should combine simple, uniform, single ended or differential transmission lines that are evaluated for performance using a SPICE simulation tool. An example of the circuit topology of a differential via is shown in Figure 3.

Fig. 3

There are only two parameters that define a single ended transmission line; its characteristic impedance and its time delay. For a differential via, you must include both its odd and even mode impedances as well as the time delay.

What is the characteristic impedance of a via barrel, with its return path being a combination of adjacent return via and coupling to the planes it passes through? The answer is the most common answer offered in signal integrity, “it depends” – on the barrel diameter, clearance hole size, presence of non-functional pads, and spacing between the planes. However, for most typical design rules, the via impedance will range from 30 to 70 ohms. Given its short length, typically less than 200 mils, even this wide range of impedance has only a small impact on a signal.

The signal degradation introduced at a via is not from the via barrel path, but from the stubs connected to the ends of the via barrel. Add a 30-Ohm stub that is 200 mils long to a short via and the insertion loss can drop by more than 30 dB, dramatically affecting transmitted signal quality. Figure 4 compares the simulated insertion loss of a 200 mil long, 30 ohm via with no stubs, to a short via (from layer 1 to layer 4) with a 200 mil long via stub.

Fig. 4

There is a huge resonant dip at the frequency where the length of the stub is one quarter of a wavelength. Any frequency components of a signal near this resonant frequency will be completely blocked by the via stub.

Stub Length and Resonant Frequency

The high frequency behavior of a via is dominated by the interference caused by the transmitted signal, along with the signal that reflects off the bottom of the stub. This is illustrated in Figure 5.

Fig. 5

The signal incident to the via is traveling down the 50 ohm impedance of the top signal line. The signal enters the via and hits the ‘T’ intersection where the signal splits. About half the signal travels down to the second signal layer, following in the wake of the initial signal heading to the receiver.

The two signals traveling in the forward direction to the receiver will interact with each other. If the extra path length the signal took in going down the via stub, reflecting and coming back up the via stub (a round trip delay) is half a cycle, then the two signals traveling to the receiver will be out of phase and they will subtract.

The frequency where this first resonance occurs is when the round trip delay of the stub is half a cycle. This corresponds to a resonant frequency of f = 1.5/Len, with the frequency in GHz and the via stub length in inches.

If the resonant absorption from the via is to have little impact on the transmitted signal, then its resonant frequency must be much higher than the bandwidth of the signal in the data stream. The bandwidth of the signal is the Nyquist frequency, which is roughly one-half times the bit rate. For the via stub to have no affect on the transmitted signal, the resonant frequency of the stub should be much higher than the signal bandwidth.

As a rough rule of thumb, if BR equals the bit rate in Gbps, this means f > ~ 10 x ½ x BR, or via stub length, in mils < 300/BR. A 10 Gbps data stream should have all stubs of less than about 30 mils in its signal path.

Optimizing Stubs

The first step in minimizing the impact from stubs is to keep their length as short as possible. In a multilayer board, one way of keeping stub lengths short is by limiting the signal layer transitions. In an extreme case, high-speed signals will only be routed on the top and bottom layers so that any via between these layers will have no stub at all.

A slight amendment to this design guideline might be to limit any high-speed signal transitions from near a top layer to near a bottom layer. This will limit the length of a via from the surface to the lowest signal layer. For example, never route a signal from layer 1 to layer 4, but you can route a signal from layers 1 through 4 to layers 10 through 14.

If you can’t make a via stub shorter, then the next knob to tweak is to increase their impedance by decreasing their capacitance. This can be accomplished by:

  • Use as narrow a barrel diameter as possible
  • Minimize the size of capture pads on the top and bottom surfaces
  • Remove all non functional pads on all intermediate layers
  • Increase the clearance holes through all planes as much as possible

Every decrease in capacitance will help reduce the impact of the via stub. How do you know if it is enough? Use a full wave 3D field solver to simulate the via and its stub, or build a candidate via in a test coupon and measure it.

Back Drilling Stubs

Sometimes it is not possible to restrict the layer transitions, and no matter how low you get the capacitance, you still have a stub and the impact of its resonance. You might still be able to eliminate the via stub by using blind or buried vias. An alternative is to back drill the via stub to remove the conductive barrel.

Back drilling has become a conventional process that most fab shops routinely do with only a small price premium. The through hole via is manufactured in the conventional way, and then a drill bit with a diameter a few mils larger than the barrel is used to drill out the stub from one side of the board. This requires controlled depth drilling, which can typically be controlled to within 5-10 mils.

Using back drilling, residual via stubs can easily be kept to less than 20 mils, which enables good signal quality for even 15 Gbps signals. Many backplanes have demonstrated more than 10 Gbps operation with conventional FR-4, pre-emphasis and equalization and with back drilled vias.

Conclusions

A tiny via stub, less than 150 mils long, can affect the performance of a high-speed serial link much more than an entire 50 inch long interconnect. The stub can be tamed by keeping its length short. Using the combination of careful design guidelines in the physical design of a via and restricting signal layer transitions, along with technology options such as back drilled vias, a high-speed designer should not hesitate to incorporate vias in multigigabit designs. PCD&F

Dr. Eric Bogatin is president of Bogatin Enterprises LLC; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedInPrint Article