Andy BujaSolving for EMC issues within the layout is as important as completing DRCs.

When it comes to design rule checks for PCB designs, some should be performed that are just as important as spacing rules. Strict adherence to basic PCB design rule checks, such as track to track, track to via, via to via, pad to track etc. – though necessary to avoid short circuits – only scratch the surface when trying to identify potential design flaws. I often see PCB designs that are completed based on this premise and wonder what else could be hiding in the design?

DRC rules covering the verification of min and max length of routed critical signals like clicks and strobes, as well as skew differences in multi-bit buses, are as important as metal spacing rules. If the minimal skew is not achieved, the PCB design will be scrapped just as easily as if shorts resulted in burning holes in the PCB during power-up.

The average designer strives to meet the requirements of 100% error-free design rule checking. Many also make sure the high-speed signals are routed to proper length specification. Is that enough?

Depending on the PCB design, it may be enough. But what other DRC rules are available to help avoid basic EMC anomalies at the board level? After all, once the PCB design is assembled and powered, it now has a date with the EMC chamber. If the results are not favorable, the engineer is responsible for finding the source of the problems.

Here are some tips to help eliminate problems that may be originating in the PCB itself:

  • Check for the basics like innerlayer crosstalk, where traces are routed in the same direction on adjacent layers.
  • Visually examine every net while the entire PCB design is in a low light mode. Looking for open and closed loops in routing patterns (again another interlayer anomaly resulting in radiation) sounds a little crazy, but it’s necessary during the layout phase.
  • Ensure proper bypass capacitor placement in strict accordance with engineering know-how, and the manufacturer’s guidelines are crucial. That big custom ASIC or FPGA may experience a ground bounce. If not, the capacitor requirements are not met.

The list of potential EMC board-level problems can go on and on. The fact is it still takes time and resources to debug a bad PCB. It may happen often enough in a given company that design engineers must factor in extra time just for this process.

Solving for EMC issues within the layout is as important as completing design rule checks for spacing. The more rules available to help identify PCB design flaws upfront, the better off you are. When working with a tool that provides the next level of DRC rules that focus on EMC issues, you can quickly and easily identify the rules that have flagged known issues in previous PCBs and adopt them as part of a standard PCB design playbook. PCB designers should embrace this type of rule checking, since it increases the likelihood of a successful design the first time.


FIGURE 1. EMC analysis performs dozens of user-configurable checks to avoid costly EMI problems.

Andy Buja is a senior applications engineer for CADStar and CR-5000 at Zuken; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedInPrint Article